Directions: In the following question, a given question is followed by information in three statements. You have to decide the data in which statement(s) is sufficient to answer the question and mark your answer accordingly.
There are seven persons, Kabir, Roy, Manav, Adi, Babu, Malik, and Boman are sitting in a row facing north direction. Each person owns a different brand of car which are Kia, Tata, Maruti, Toyota, Hyundai. BMW, and Mahindra but not necessarily in the same order.
The one who owns Toyota sits fourth to the left of Adi, who owns Tata and either of them sits at the extreme end of the row. Roy owns Mahindra. The one who owns Kia sits third to the left of the one who owns BMW, who neither sits adjacent to the one who owns Toyota nor adjacent to Adi. Babu neither owns Toyota nor Kia, sits third to the left of Roy.
Who sits at the immediate right of Kabir?
Statement I: Two persons sit between the one who owns Maruti and Manav. Three persons sit between Boman and the one who owns Hyundai.
Statement II: The one who owns Hyundai sits second to the left of Manav. The one who owns Maruti sits at the immediate right of Boman.
Statement III: Three persons sit between Malik and Kabir, who doesn't own Maruti. Boman and the one who owns Maruti sit together.

Question

Question

This question was previously asked in

SBI PO Mains Memory Based Paper (Held on:02 January 2022)

The data in any two statements are sufficient to answer the question.
The data in statement III is sufficient to answer the question, and the data in statement I and II is not required to answer the question.
The data in either statement I, II or III are sufficient to answer the question.
The data in statement II and III is sufficient to answer the question, and the data in statement I is not required to answer the question.
The data in all the statements, even together are not sufficient to answer the question.

Answer 1

By the information:

The one who owns Toyota sits fourth to the left of Adi, who owns Tata and either of them sits at the extreme end of the row. (considering 2 cases)

Roy owns Mahindra.

The one who owns Kia sits third to the left of the one who owns BMW, who neither sits adjacent to the one who owns Toyota nor adjacent to Adi.

Babu neither owns Toyota nor Kia, sits third to the left of Roy.

Case 1:

Case 2:

From Statement I:

We have,

Two persons sit between the one who owns Maruti and Manav. (case 1 canceled)

Three persons sit between Boman and the one who owns Hyundai.

Case 2:

The position of Kabir is not definite.

From Statement II:

We have,

The one who owns Hyundai sits second to the left of Manav.

The one who owns Maruti sits at the immediate right of Boman.

Case 1:

Case 2:

The position of Kabir is not definite.

From Statement III:

We have,

Three persons sit between Malik and Kabir, who doesn't own Maruti.

Boman and the one who owns Maruti sit together. (case 1 eliminated)

Manav sits at the immediate right of Kabir.

The data in statement III is sufficient to answer the question, and the data in statement I and II is not required to answer the question.